How to make a Report
The Whistleblower may make use of the following internal channels

use of the dedicated Whistleblower Software platform accessible through the link: https://whistleblowersoftware.com/secure/REVO
paper report, sent in three sealed envelopes (a first one with the identity data of the Reporting Party, a second one, containing the first envelope, with the Report, so as to separate the identity data of the Reporting Party from the Report, and a third sealed envelope, containing the first two), marked 'Confidential Personal', to the attention of:

Head of the Internal Reporting System
To the attention of the Head of the Internal Audit Function
REVO Insurance S.p.A.
Viale dell’Agricoltura 7
37135 Verona (Italy)

With reference to the first modality, it is possible to make the Report either in written or oral form.
Finally, it should be noted that the Report, at the request of the Reporting Party, may also be made through a direct meeting with the Head of the Internal Reporting System (or, in case of conflict of interest, with the Supplementary Manager).
If the Whistleblower considers that there is a risk of conflict of interest concerning the figure of the Head of the Internal Reporting System, he may send the Reports, in the same way, specifying that they should be addressed to the attention of the Assistant Manager. The Company has adopted controls at Group level to ensure proper allocation/management of this case, ensuring - in a logic of "four-eyes principle" - access to internal channels, on a continuous basis, also to the aforementioned Supplementary Manager. For the Whistleblower it is possible, for the cases provided for in Article 6 of Legislative Decree No. 24 of March 10, 2023, to turn to the external channel ANAC.
The Whistleblower must provide any useful element to enable the corporate offices to proceed with the verifications for the parts falling within their competence and with the checks to ascertain whether the Report is well-founded. To this end, the Report must meet at least the following minimum requirements:

clear and complete description of the facts reported, including, the circumstances of time and place in which they were committed
generalities or other elements that make it possible to identify the person who committed what has been reported;
particulars of any other persons informed of the facts who can report on them;
indication of any documents proving the validity of such facts;
any other useful information that helps to confirm the existence of the facts reported.

Reports must be made in good faith. The platform (equipped with features such as end-to-end encryption, metadata removal, voice distortion, no IP address collection) and the related Reporting procedure are structured to ensure the confidentiality of the identity of the Reporting Party, of the persons involved (to whom the violation is attributed or otherwise implicated in the reported violation) and of the persons mentioned in the Report, as well as the content of the Report and related documentation.
Reports may also be made anonymously, provided they contain specific and circumstantiated information. In such cases, protection is ensured even if the Whistleblower is subsequently identified or his identity is only revealed at a later stage.
While emphasising the importance of using the internal channels indicated above, it is possible to make a Report to the National Anti-Corruption Authority (ANAC), in the manner provided for on the institutional site of the Entity, if, at the time of its submission, one of the following conditions is met:

there is no mandatory activation of the internal reporting channel within the work context, or the channel is not active or, even if activated, does not comply with the external rules;
the Whistleblower has already made an internal Report, pursuant to the relevant external legislation, and the same has not been followed up;
the Whistleblower has well-founded reasons to believe that, if he/she were to make an internal Report, it would not be effectively followed up, or that the same Report could give rise to the risk of retaliation;
the Whistleblower has reasonable grounds to believe that the breach may constitute an imminent or obvious danger to the public interest.